|
EMAIL LIST PROJECT |
Josh On. Jan/Feb 1999. |
|
Proposal
Research
Design
Execution |
|
|
Social Aspects of Email Lists
There is surprisingly little written about
email lists, yet they are one of the most successful
and longest running institutions on
the internet, dating back to at least the 1970s. Maybe it is
because they are simple and they work well, and there
is not much more to say. There
is a lot more to
say and ask though. What makes a good list? What makes lists
so successful? How might they evolve? How come they have
lasted so long relatively unchanged? I want to expand on some of these
questions and point to areas for more research.
List
Dynamics
There are other formal roles that might be
carried out on lists, such as that of the list moderator or
leader. On moderated lists the list moderator will read the
post and decide whether they should be delivered to the rest of the
list. List leaders can find themselves in quite political situations. It is not uncommon for lists to split or drastically drop in size when there is a lot of spams (unwanted posts) or flaming (accusationary posts). The list leader has many different options available to him or her in cases where this happens. They can threaten to unsubcribe offending members, poll the group for their opinions, or advise others to ignore the offending posts on the principle that they will usually disappear with time, and of course new strategies and variations are created all the time as they are in all arenas of life in groups.
The
asynchronous and non-spacial nature of email lists can also create
some interesting dynamics. Discussions happen within certain
subject headers. For example at one time their might be one thread
of posts about flowers and another about a recent movie.
Whilst these threads might in some sense constitute separate spaces,
there is often a prevailing mood on a list. A member of a list may
die or someone on the list will be discussing some very personal
aspects of their life with others on the list. On some occasions I
have felt it inappropriate to start another thread about something
unrelated and trivial in comparison. The contrast is just too
stark. Yet other conversations may be in full flight at the
time, and posts may still be coming in from those who haven't
downloaded the most recent messages, so it is possible to get
some extremely dynamic and intensely emotional periods on a
list that might not occur in other arenas.
Sociometry
I
tracked the
posts of one particularly prolific list observing who started a
subject, and who responded. You can view my sketchy diagram of
this here.
Moreno
would make similar sociograms of groups structures and analyse
different group formations and dynamics within them. These are
powerful tools and might actually make somethings apparent that
whilst are being experienced by members of the list might not be
explitly acknowledged.
Links
|